Popular Nigerian blogger, Pinovibes has accused music superstar Davido of causing them to lose their social media page, which boasted over 1.8 million followers. The blogger’s claim comes in the wake of allegations surrounding Davido’s endorsement of Racksterli, an investment platform now accused of engaging in fraudulent activities. Pinovibes’ social media account was reportedly taken down after the blogger criticized the artist’s ties to the platform.
The allegations have added fuel to an ongoing controversy regarding Davido’s involvement in business ventures that have faced scrutiny. Racksterli, the investment platform at the center of the controversy, has been criticized for allegedly scamming investors. Davido, who once endorsed the platform, has found himself at the center of the debate over his role in promoting the business, which has since been labeled a fraud by some users on social media.
On the platform X (formerly Twitter), a user named Salako weighed in on the matter, criticizing Davido’s fanbase for defending the artist despite his involvement in multiple controversial ventures. Salako posted, “If you support, love, and defend Davido, I don’t think you have any moral standing to call anyone else out for fraud. That lad has been instrumental to four major scams: Racksterli, $Echoke, $Rapdoge, and $DAVIDO. He might be likeable, but he is also a petty little thief.”
The statement from Salako reignites a long-standing debate about the ethical implications of celebrity endorsements and the responsibilities of public figures. While Davido is widely admired for his contributions to music and philanthropy, his association with certain business ventures has sparked criticism. The controversy has led many to question whether celebrities like Davido should be more cautious when endorsing financial products and services.
Critics argue that Davido’s influence could potentially mislead followers, especially when promoting platforms that later turn out to be scams. As an influential figure in Nigeria and beyond, the expectations placed on him to maintain ethical standards are high. However, some of his supporters have dismissed the claims as baseless and unfair, suggesting that the artist’s involvement with these ventures was a result of misplaced trust rather than intentional wrongdoing.
